Araştırma Makalesi

Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of “Kosovo A and B” Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 2 Mart 2019
PDF İndir
EN

Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of “Kosovo A and B” Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo

Abstract

Kosovo as a state in Europe poses a serious problem of air pollution, due to the production of electricity from Kosovo A and Kosovo B coal fired-power plants, which use coal as fuel. Although Kosovo possesses large coal reserves, the monetary income from the production of electric power from the Coal-Fires Power Plants is very low and too much coal spending, which is a huge resource loss as well as a very valuable natural resource for future generations. Implementation of nuclear reactors may bring profits to this country and coal could have been sold as a raw material in various sectors, thus probably the state could earn about half a billion euros each year, this is due to the non-construction of a nuclear power plant. Kosovo is losing more than 2 billion amounts euro of coal-fired coal for 18 years due to coal-fired power plants. During 2017, Kosovo produced 5 300 000 MWh of electricity. Kosovo had also extracted 8 million tons of coal to produce electricity, while a nuclear reactor needs about 264.99 kg of 235U per year. The aim of this research is to highlight the increment of the price of electricity in the region of Kosovo and therefore standing as a big obstacle to foreign investment.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1]. A. H. Veliu, A. M. Syla, K. Berisha 26th Annual American Association for Aerosol Research Conference, September pp. 24 – 28, in Reno, Nevada – USA, (2007).[2]. N. M. Daci, M. N. Daci- Ajvazi, “Shkenca e Mjedisit”, pp.59-60,63, 65,66, Prishtinë, (2014)[3]. P. Lang, “Nuclear Power Learning and Deployment Rates”, Disruption and Global Benefits Forgone. Energies. 10(12):2169. (2017)[4]. J. Serp, C. Poinssot, S. Bourg. “Assessment of the Anticipated Environmental Footprint of Future Nuclear Energy Systems. Evidence of the Beneficial Effect of Extensive Recycling”. Energies. 10(9):1445. (2017)[5]. I. Filipoviq , S. Lipanoviq. “Kimia e Përgjithshme” pp.631,Universiteti i Prishtinës, (1997)[6]. S. Malaj, F. Hasani, B. Daci. “Radiokimia”, pp. 54, 62-63, Prishtinë, (2014)[7]. http://kek-energy.com/kek/termocentrali-kosova-a/[8]. http://kek-energy.com/kek/termocentrali-kosova-b/[9].http://kek-energy.com/kek/divizioni-qymyrit/historiku-i-divizionit-te-prodhimit-te-qymyrit/[10]. I. Filipoviq, S. Lipanoviq, “Kimia Inorganike”, p.1052, Prishtinë, (1997).[11]. D. F. Shriver, P.W. Atkins, T. L. Rourke, M. T. Weller, F. A. Armstrong. “Kimia Inorganike”. p.583, Oxford UK, (2009). [12]. J. W. Hill, R. H. Petrucci, T. W. McCreary, S. S. Perry, “Kimia e Përgjithshme”, p. 811, SHBA, (2014).[13]. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Public Affairs Washington, DC Volume 24 (August 2012).http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph241/zarubin1/docs/ML12241A166.pdf [14]. A. Gabbar, C.A. Stoute, D. Bondarenko, N. Tarsitano, A. Abdel Rihem, S. Sirakov, S. Jani. S, Menashi S. X-Pinch. “Plasma Generation Testing for Neutron Source Development and Nuclear Fusion”. Energies. 11(4):988, (2011).[15]. K. Krane, “Fizika Moderne”, p. 456, Tiranë, (2003).[16].http://www.worldnuclear.org/uploadedfiles/org/info/pdf/economicsnp.pdf[17].https://www.euronuclear.org/info/encyclopedia/f/fuelcomparison.htm

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mühendislik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

2 Mart 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

24 Ekim 2018

Kabul Tarihi

21 Şubat 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Beluli, V. M. (2019). Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of “Kosovo A and B” Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo. Journal of Nuclear Sciences, 5(2), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1501/nuclear_0000000046
AMA
1.Beluli VM. Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of “Kosovo A and B” Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo. Journal of Nuclear Sciences. 2019;5(2):34-42. doi:10.1501/nuclear_0000000046
Chicago
Beluli, V. M. 2019. “Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of ‘Kosovo A and B’ Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo”. Journal of Nuclear Sciences 5 (2): 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1501/nuclear_0000000046.
EndNote
Beluli VM (01 Mart 2019) Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of “Kosovo A and B” Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo. Journal of Nuclear Sciences 5 2 34–42.
IEEE
[1]V. M. Beluli, “Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of ‘Kosovo A and B’ Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo”, Journal of Nuclear Sciences, c. 5, sy 2, ss. 34–42, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1501/nuclear_0000000046.
ISNAD
Beluli, V. M. “Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of ‘Kosovo A and B’ Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo”. Journal of Nuclear Sciences 5/2 (01 Mart 2019): 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1501/nuclear_0000000046.
JAMA
1.Beluli VM. Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of “Kosovo A and B” Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo. Journal of Nuclear Sciences. 2019;5:34–42.
MLA
Beluli, V. M. “Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of ‘Kosovo A and B’ Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo”. Journal of Nuclear Sciences, c. 5, sy 2, Mart 2019, ss. 34-42, doi:10.1501/nuclear_0000000046.
Vancouver
1.V. M. Beluli. Implementation of Nuclear Power Plants instead of “Kosovo A and B” Power Plants as the only Rescue of Coal Resources in the Republic of Kosovo. Journal of Nuclear Sciences. 01 Mart 2019;5(2):34-42. doi:10.1501/nuclear_0000000046