Abstract
References
- Degerlier, M., Karahan, G., Ozger, G., 2008. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples around Adana, Turkey. J Environ. Radioact. 99, 1018 – 1025.
- Erees, F. S., Akozcan, S., Parlak Y., Cam, S., 2006. Assessment of dose rates around Manisa. Radiat. Meas., 41, 598 - 601.
- Karahan, G., Bayulken, A., 2000. Assessment of gamma dose rates in Istanbul, Turkey. J Environ. Radioact. 47213 - 221.
- Lu, X., Chao, S., Yang, F., 2014. Determination of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazard in building materials used in Weinan, China. Radiat. Phys. and Chem. 99, 62 - 67.
- Mavi, B., Akkurt I., 2010. Natural radioactivity and radiation hazards in some building materials used in Isparta, Turkey. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 79, 933 - 937.
- OECD. 2011. Evolution of ICRP Recommendations 1977, 1990 and 2007. 28. Sharaf, J.M., Hamideen, M.S., 2013. Measurement of natural radioactivity in Jordanian building materials and their contribution to the public in door gamma dose rate. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 80, 61 - 66.
- UNSCEAR, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2000. Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Annex B: Exposures from Natural Sources of Radiation, United Nations, New York.
Abstract
In this study, the measurements were performed 1 m
above the ground in air and surface soils at certain points in the city of Gaziantep
located at south of Turkey with a populatıon of 1.5 million. Air and soil measurements were carried out by
portable detectors and gamma spectrometry system. As a result of measurements
performed in the air, average annual effective dose of 66.81 µSv y-1 and
gamma counting of 50.43 1 s-1 were found. On the other hand, as a
result of gamma spectrometric analyses in the surface soil samples, average
activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K were found to be 28.92, 29.49 and 255.30 Bq kg-1,
respectively. Calculated absorbed dose rate and annual effective dose values
depending on the activity concentrations, were found to be 38.45 nGy h-1
and 47.17 µSv y-1. When the measured values are compared with UNSCEAR
2000 report’s worldwide average value, our result is slightly lower than these
values.
References
- Degerlier, M., Karahan, G., Ozger, G., 2008. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples around Adana, Turkey. J Environ. Radioact. 99, 1018 – 1025.
- Erees, F. S., Akozcan, S., Parlak Y., Cam, S., 2006. Assessment of dose rates around Manisa. Radiat. Meas., 41, 598 - 601.
- Karahan, G., Bayulken, A., 2000. Assessment of gamma dose rates in Istanbul, Turkey. J Environ. Radioact. 47213 - 221.
- Lu, X., Chao, S., Yang, F., 2014. Determination of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazard in building materials used in Weinan, China. Radiat. Phys. and Chem. 99, 62 - 67.
- Mavi, B., Akkurt I., 2010. Natural radioactivity and radiation hazards in some building materials used in Isparta, Turkey. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 79, 933 - 937.
- OECD. 2011. Evolution of ICRP Recommendations 1977, 1990 and 2007. 28. Sharaf, J.M., Hamideen, M.S., 2013. Measurement of natural radioactivity in Jordanian building materials and their contribution to the public in door gamma dose rate. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 80, 61 - 66.
- UNSCEAR, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2000. Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Annex B: Exposures from Natural Sources of Radiation, United Nations, New York.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Nuclear Sciences |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 25, 2017 |
| Submission Date | April 25, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 1 |