Öz
Kaynakça
- ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International
- Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP 37, 2-4 (2007).
- Draft Report for Consultation. ICRP Ref 4834-1783-0153,16-18 (2011).
- NRC Regulatory Guide 8.10, Revision 1-R(1975).
- United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR).Report to the General Assembly. Vol. I Annex B 304–306 (2008).
- Thompson M.A., ‘‘Maintaining a proper perspective of risk associated with radiation exposure’’. J. Nucl. Med. Tech. 29, 137–142 (2001).
- Martins M.B., Alves J.G., Abrantes J.N., Roda A.R., ‘‘Occupational exposure in nuclear medicine in Portugal in the 1999–2003 period’’, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 125, 130–134 (2007).
- Valuckas K., Atkocius V., Samerdokiene V., ‘‘Occupational exposure of medical radiation workers in Lithuania, 1991–2003’’, Acta Medica Lituanica 14, 155–159 (2007).
- Neves D., Valeb F.F., Pascoal A. ‘‘The profile and practice of nuclear medicine technologists in Portugal: findings from a nationwide survey’’, Nucl. Med. Commun. 33, 1277-1286 (2012).
Öz
Thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) are safely used to determine radiation doses. This study describes the radiation exposure doses of the radiation employees working at the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty in Turkey, where both radionuclide treatment and diagnostic imaging are done at a large scale. According to our results, the average effective dose value over five years belonging to an employee who works at radionuclide treatment service was found to have the highest value as 3.58±1.60 mSv. On the other hand, the average effective dose over a of total 29 employees is 1.53±0.59 mSv. A 5-year average effective dose was found as 1.29 mSv for technicians and 2.38 mSv for nurses. These results demonstrated that the radiation doses received by the employees working in different units are considerably different from each other. However, the doses received by all the workers in these units are under the regulatory limit. In conclusion, homogenized dose distribution between employees can be achieved in case of job rotations in-between
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International
- Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP 37, 2-4 (2007).
- Draft Report for Consultation. ICRP Ref 4834-1783-0153,16-18 (2011).
- NRC Regulatory Guide 8.10, Revision 1-R(1975).
- United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR).Report to the General Assembly. Vol. I Annex B 304–306 (2008).
- Thompson M.A., ‘‘Maintaining a proper perspective of risk associated with radiation exposure’’. J. Nucl. Med. Tech. 29, 137–142 (2001).
- Martins M.B., Alves J.G., Abrantes J.N., Roda A.R., ‘‘Occupational exposure in nuclear medicine in Portugal in the 1999–2003 period’’, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 125, 130–134 (2007).
- Valuckas K., Atkocius V., Samerdokiene V., ‘‘Occupational exposure of medical radiation workers in Lithuania, 1991–2003’’, Acta Medica Lituanica 14, 155–159 (2007).
- Neves D., Valeb F.F., Pascoal A. ‘‘The profile and practice of nuclear medicine technologists in Portugal: findings from a nationwide survey’’, Nucl. Med. Commun. 33, 1277-1286 (2012).
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Mühendislik |
| Bölüm | Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 29 Ocak 2016 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 15 Eylül 2014 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2016Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 |