Assessment of occupational exposure in non-medical facilities of Bangladesh

QMR Nizam, S Shill, M Haider
1.817 583


The concern about occupational exposure is being increased by the worker and regulatory body day by day in Bangladesh. After establishment of Bangladesh Atomic Energy Regulatory Authority (BAERA) this type of study has been carried out extensively for creating database about the safety of occupational worker in different facilities. The present research work has been performed on major non-medical radiological facilities including non-destructive testing (NDT), nucleonic gauge and irradiation facilities. Among these facilities, the workers of Engineer Inspection Services, Bangladesh (EISB) received high radiation doses. The outcome of the present study also shows that the radiation workers of NDT facilities are exposed to more radiation than any other facilities. This is because they used to work with high activity radiation source at offsite area. Every NDT facility should be more equipped with radiation shielding and personal protective equipment. These data can be utilized by BAERA in future for further strengthening of radiation safety infrastructure for the concerned workers.


Occupational Exposure, Radiation Dose, TLD, Non Destructive Testing, Irradiator, BAERA

Full Text:



World Health Organisation. “Ionising Radiation in our Environment ionizing_radiation/env/en/.

(Accessible on: 08.06.2010)

ICRP Publication 103. “The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection”. Annals of the ICRP; 37 (2-4). Oxford: Pergamon Elsevier; 2007.

Covens P, Berus D, Buls N, Clerinx P, Vanhavere F. “Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals: Global Assessment, Critical Applications and Future Needs”. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 124(3). 250–259 (2007).

International Commission on Radiological Protection. “General Principle for the Protection of Workers”. ICRP Publication 75, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1997).

A.N. Al-Haj, C.S. Lagarde, “Statistical analysis of historical occupational dose records at a large medical center”. Health Phys. 83. 854-860 (2002).

Faiz M. Khan. "The Physics of Radiation Therapy". Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2003).

“User’s Instruction Guide Individual Monitoring Service by TLD”. Health Physics Division Atomic Energy Centre, Dhaka; 4 Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 Bangladesh Atomic Energy

Commission; May 2012 (

Product Specifications;

IAEA-TECDOC-1344. “Categorization of radioactive sources; Revision of IAEA-TECDOC-1191, Categorization of radiation sources”. International Atomic Energy Agency; July 2003.

Safety Guide No. RS-G-1.9. “Categorization of Radioactive Sources”. International Atomic Energy Agency. VIENNA, 2005.

Webster, E.W. “EDE for exposure with protective aprons”.Health Phys., 56:568-569, (1989).

Sanaye SS, Baburajan S, Pawar SG, Nalawade SK, SapraBK.”Occupational exposures in industrial application of radiation during 1999-2008”. RadiatProt Environ., 35:17-21 (2012).

Noriah Mod Ali. “Evolution of radiation protection trends-the Malaysian Perspective”. Progress in nuclear science and technology, 1: 14-19 (2011).

SAFETY SERIES No. 115. “International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of radiation Sources”. International Atomic Energy Agency; VIENNA, 1996.